The old saying, “there’s more than one way to skin a cat,” can easily be applied to the art of faceshield replacement. It seems as if every company has a different system for removing and replacing shields, all claiming their method as the best. SSB tested these claims to see how some of the most popular designs stacked up.
The procedure: In an effort to preserve some scientific methodology, SSB had two testers try their hands at a shield replacement three times in a row on eight helmets. An average was then calculated. As expected, each tester’s times got better with each remove and replace (R&R), but anomolies occurred and are recorded in the score.
The timed process included picking up the lid, removing the face shield, setting the shield on the table, picking it back up and reinstalling it before closing the lid and putting the helmet back on the table.
KBC VR-4R
Mechanism type: Spring loaded circular clamshell design with a push-button release
Fitment notes: To remove the shield, push the release button with the shield in the highest position, then pull outward on the shield. The install process is even easier since the shield can be pushed into the hinge mechanism at any angle and without the release button being depressed. The KBC mechanism was extremely easy to use on all accounts, with virtually no learning curve.
Fitment Quality: 9.5/10
Average time: 18.7 secs
Joe Rocket RKT-Prime Vector
Mechanism type: Spring loaded semi-circular clamshell design with a push-button release.
Fitment notes: To ditch this shield press the release button while the shield is in the upmost position and pull outward to set it free. To install, align the tabs on the semi-circular shield with the helmet mechanism and push inward. The process is quick and simple, but the shield must be properly aligned for a correct fit.
Fitment Quality: 9/10
Average time: 17.8 secs.
Arai RX-Q
Mechanism type: Forward mounted, locking mechanism with spring loaded release levers.
Fitment notes: The Arai has the steepest learning curve, but once each tester understood the process, the task was simple. The removal method starts with the shield in the upmost position, which automatically releases the small hinge-mounted levers. Pull on the lever and release (one on each side) to free the locking cams and then pull upward on the shield to release. To install, direct the small guide pin into the bottom guide of the helmet track and then rotate the shield as if closing it until it pops into place. All mechanisms issue a secure click when the process is done correctly, but without clear side plates it’s a nearly blind process that takes practice to make perfect.
Fitment Quality: 9/10
Average time: 17.3 secs
Speed and Strength SS2000
Mechanism type: Spring-loaded circular clamshell with a push-button release and a guide track.
Fitment notes: With the shield in the upmost position, push the release button and firmly pull outward. The install procedure is much the same, save for aligning the guide pin on the shield with the guide track on the helmet before pushing the pivot hinge into place. This can be tricky at first since the alignment must be precise, but by the second shot each tester had mastered the process .
Fitment Quality: 9/10
Average time: 20.1 secs
Scorpion EXO-500 Ardent
Mechanism type: Spring-loaded, shield over-pivot mechanism with twisting release button
Fitment notes: The removal process is simple; twist the release button with the shield in the highest position and pull outward. Voila. The install method requires a pin on the shield to be placed into a relief on the helmet before popping the shield over the hinge mechanism, which can take practice. After a few attempts it becomes second nature and the positive engagement of the locking mechanisms is also added insurance for a secured fit.
Fitment Quality: 9.5/10
Average time: 21.2 secs
Sparx Kintaro
Mechanism type: Spring-loaded, round locking mechanism with a push-button release
Fitment notes: The Sparx shield was a bit difficult to remove, as its guide pin repeatedly snagged the lid. While this slowed progress it also ensured smooth shield operation so its a blessing and a quibble. A push of the release button when the shield is completely open and an outward tug removes the unit. The guide pin must be aligned in the track before the pivot hinge can be pushed into place during the shield installation, but the mechanism gives a positive click once it’s into place.
Fitment Quality: 8.5/10
Average time: 23.6 secs
Icon Airframe
Mechanism type: Semi-round locking mechanism with locking release lever
Fitment notes: The Icon mechanism offered positive engagement, but required the user to be accurate during the R&R process since the shield must be in the upmost position and the guides accurately aligned. Then, testers had to flip the release lever forward and pull the shield outward from the hinge. The installation is much the same, but can prove challenging at first since proper alignment is crucial. Although the Icon was the only helmet without a spring-loaded mechanism, it didn’t hurt performance or speed as each tester found it on par with the rest of the lids.
Fitment Quality: 9.0/10
Average time: 24.6 secs
Myth: Busted
The answer to who’s boss isn’t exactly clear. While the Arai was the quickest, it also had the steepest learning curve and required an Arai aficionado to show the testers the process. On the other hand, the KBC, Speed and Strength, Joe Rocket and Scorpion were all tied for next place. They were only seconds behind the Arai, but were self-explanatory and bonehead simple.
Rather than outright installation speed, the issue became one of hinge mechanism security and durability. Most riders don’t replace their shields all that often–and when they do, what’s an extra few seconds? All of these helmets have a secure system. When buying your next lid have a salesperson show you the shield replacement procedures so you’ll know if it’s something you can live with or not. Remember, there are no warranties that will cover a busted mechanism because you flubbed the installation.